Obsidian is one, but it is not the primary feature and they are going to want to have people commit to their ecosystem it feels. I bet Sublime will be the best editor to use overall, I can already tell. The way i see it, there are a million markdown editors. If I were skwire or someone like that, I'd make a third party tool specifically for visualizing a zettel collection, without any editing features. Zettlr is still good, but Sublime seems to have more useful features for the links and automation.Įdit.and Obsidian is still the best collection viewer.
QOWNNOTES REVIEW WINDOWS
I see this being the optimal solution for Windows users.
QOWNNOTES REVIEW SOFTWARE
The good thing, since they are just text files, you can use all these software simultaneously. That's a big deal and almost reason enough to use sublime. A search box appears inline and you can search the words from there, it is much better. It's the ID/title issue again.īut with sublime, i think it handles that better. I don't see a nice way around it, and it makes the entire software very hard to use for that reason. Zettlr has an issue where if you want to insert a link, it will only show the ID/filename which is just numbers, so impossible to search for words and link that way. Although the interface is a little complex due to forcing a normal text editor to fit this method vs creating an entirely new dedicated spite that, the features implemented are very nice. All the lines in Sublime are going to be the same height, so you lose that aspect of the nice visual.īut the sublime way has some nice strengths. So a header can be tall, and lots of white space. The other markdown or zettel specific software (like zettlr) can make the notes look very very pretty because they can have different sized lines. It lacks one thing: visual presentation of the editor. The more I wrap my mind around all this, I think for window users the Sublime way is the most safe and ideal for the method. I don't know where I read that, but I just tried on Sublime 3 and it works, and the site says it is actively maintained, although no changes since 2018. It's a failing on my part, but I haven't found anything that really helps with that without it seeming like 'too much'.Ĭorrect.
QOWNNOTES REVIEW ARCHIVE
So my notes never get from the inbox to the archive referenced. If I just do it without thinking about it, I get little idiosyncracies in how they're categorized. I can't get from step 1 to step 2 in most cases. Step 2 is thinking about where it should be once it's in the inbox One big question: what workflow tools and structures do we want inside the note system app and what do we want in separate apps or merely in the user's head?
workflows for daily use (timestamps, global history, global todo, work planning, todos, calendar, kanban style planning, github style issues, separate changelog/history files, spaced repetition helpers, quickly picking up work from the day before, scheduled cleanup sessions.
QOWNNOTES REVIEW CODE
notes as interacting set (auto backlinking, global search/replace, transclusion, "whole book view", code project style side panes.
single note editing/viewing (markdown features, linking syntax, highlighting, autosuggest, shortcuts, plaintext/preview. So we should really compare them in three ways:ġ. Now, good workflows are crucial also for single person note taking systems (Obsidian, Roam. ) email workflows sure are restricted and there is lots to improve! Hey's new features include a reply later stack, paper trail filter, editable email subjects, custom threading, custom notifications, attachments browsing/filtering, clips views, annotation/sticky notes on emails, anti spy pixel and more.
0 kommentar(er)
